On 2020/09/11 20:05, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
@@ -683,7 +736,7 @@ static size_t __iomap_write_end(struct inode *inode,
loff_t pos, size_t len,
        if (unlikely(copied < len && !PageUptodate(page)))
                return 0;
        iomap_set_range_uptodate(page, offset_in_page(pos), len);
-       iomap_set_page_dirty(page);
+       iomap_set_range_dirty(page, offset_in_page(pos), len);
I_think_  the call to set_range_uptodate here is now unnecessary.  The
blocks should already have been set uptodate in write_begin.  But please
check!

Hi, Matthew

Sorry it took me so long to get back to this.

I found that set_range_uptodate() might be skipped in write_begin()
in this case:

                 if (!(flags & IOMAP_WRITE_F_UNSHARE) &&
                  ┊   (from <= poff || from >= poff + plen) &&
                  ┊   (to <= poff || to >= poff + plen))
                          continue;

And iomap_adjust_read_range() can set 'poff' greater than 'from'
and 'poff + len' less than 'to'.

Thanks
Yu Kuai

Reply via email to