Hi Nathan,

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 4:09 PM Nathan Chancellor
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Functions that are passed to early_initcall should be of type
> initcall_t, which expects a return type of int. This is not currently an
> error but a patch in the Clang LTO series could change that in the
> future.
>
> Fixes: 9183c3f9ed71 ("static_call: Add inline static call infrastructure")
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200904044559.GA507165@ubuntu-n2-xlarge-x86/
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/linux/static_call.h | 6 +++---
>  kernel/static_call.c        | 5 +++--
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/static_call.h b/include/linux/static_call.h
> index bfa2ba39be57..695da4c9b338 100644
> --- a/include/linux/static_call.h
> +++ b/include/linux/static_call.h
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ extern void arch_static_call_transform(void *site, void 
> *tramp, void *func, bool
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE
>
> -extern void __init static_call_init(void);
> +extern int __init static_call_init(void);
>
>  struct static_call_mod {
>         struct static_call_mod *next;Thank you for sending the patch, this 
> looks correct to me.
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ extern int static_call_text_reserved(void *start, void 
> *end);
>
>  #elif defined(CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL)
>
> -static inline void static_call_init(void) { }
> +static inline int static_call_init(void) { return 0; }
>
>  struct static_call_key {
>         void *func;
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static inline int static_call_text_reserved(void *start, 
> void *end)
>
>  #else /* Generic implementation */
>
> -static inline void static_call_init(void) { }
> +static inline int static_call_init(void) { return 0; }
>
>  struct static_call_key {
>         void *func;
> diff --git a/kernel/static_call.c b/kernel/static_call.c
> index f8362b3f8fd5..84565c2a41b8 100644
> --- a/kernel/static_call.c
> +++ b/kernel/static_call.c
> @@ -410,12 +410,12 @@ int static_call_text_reserved(void *start, void *end)
>         return __static_call_mod_text_reserved(start, end);
>  }
>
> -void __init static_call_init(void)
> +int __init static_call_init(void)
>  {
>         int ret;
>
>         if (static_call_initialized)
> -               return;
> +               return 0;
>
>         cpus_read_lock();
>         static_call_lock();
> @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ void __init static_call_init(void)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>         register_module_notifier(&static_call_module_nb);
>  #endif
> +       return 0;
>  }
>  early_initcall(static_call_init);
>
>
> base-commit: de394e7568ce2cdb4643ed230169f484f25f9442
> --
> 2.28.0

Thank you for sending the patch, this looks correct to me.

Reviewed-by: Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>

Sami

Reply via email to