On 25.09.20 18:06, Hui Su wrote: > 1. the cpuset.c has been moved from kernel/cpuset.c to > kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c long time ago, but the comment is stale, > so we update it. > 2. get_page_from_freelist() may alloc many pages according to > order, we may use pages for better. > > Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_...@163.com> > --- > kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 +- > mm/mempolicy.c | 2 +- > mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++-- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > index 642415b8c3c9..1d3011c1aab6 100644 > --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > /* > - * kernel/cpuset.c > + * kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > * > * Processor and Memory placement constraints for sets of tasks. > * > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c > index eddbe4e56c73..ac59b049b16c 100644 > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c > @@ -2295,7 +2295,7 @@ int vma_dup_policy(struct vm_area_struct *src, struct > vm_area_struct *dst) > * rebinds the mempolicy its copying by calling mpol_rebind_policy() > * with the mems_allowed returned by cpuset_mems_allowed(). This > * keeps mempolicies cpuset relative after its cpuset moves. See > - * further kernel/cpuset.c update_nodemask(). > + * further kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c update_nodemask(). > * > * current's mempolicy may be rebinded by the other task(the task that > changes > * cpuset's mems), so we needn't do rebind work for current task. > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index fab5e97dc9ca..1e3c7493e1cb 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -3709,7 +3709,7 @@ static inline unsigned int current_alloc_flags(gfp_t > gfp_mask, > > /* > * get_page_from_freelist goes through the zonelist trying to allocate > - * a page. > + * pages.
"a page" is correct here - it's a single page of the given order (which might be composed out of various order-0 pages, but that's not the point). -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
