Hi Alex, On 10/2/20 10:48 AM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 2020-10-02 10:24, Alejandro Colomar wrote: >> On 2020-10-01 19:32, Paul Eggert wrote: >> > For 'void *' you should also mention that one cannot use arithmetic on >> > void * pointers, so they're special in that way too. >> >> Good suggestion! >> >> > Also, you should >> > warn that because one can convert from any pointer type to void * and >> > then to any other pointer type, it's a deliberate hole in C's >> > type-checking. >> >> Also good. I'll talk about generic function parameters for this. > I think the patch as is now is complete enough to be added. > > So I won't rewrite it for now. > Please review the patch as is, > and I'll add more info to this type in the future.
Actually, I would rather prefer one patch series, rather than patches on patches please. It also makes review of the overall 'void *' text easier if it's all one patch. So, If you could squash the patches together and resubmit, that would be helful. Thanks, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
