On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 15:07 +0200, Allan W. Nielsen wrote: > Hi Jiri > > On 01.10.2020 14:49, Jiri Pirko wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > > content is safe > > > > Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 12:30:18PM CEST, henrik.bjoernl...@microchip.com wrote: > > > This is the definition of the CFM switchdev interface. > > > > > > The interface consist of these objects: > > > SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MEP_CFM, > > > SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MEP_CONFIG_CFM, > > > SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_CC_CONFIG_CFM, > > > SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_CC_PEER_MEP_CFM, > > > SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_CC_CCM_TX_CFM, > > > SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MEP_STATUS_CFM, > > > SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PEER_MEP_STATUS_CFM > > > > > > MEP instance add/del > > > switchdev_port_obj_add(SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MEP_CFM) > > > switchdev_port_obj_del(SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MEP_CFM) > > > > > > MEP cofigure > > > switchdev_port_obj_add(SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MEP_CONFIG_CFM) > > > > > > MEP CC cofigure > > > switchdev_port_obj_add(SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_CC_CONFIG_CFM) > > > > > > Peer MEP add/del > > > switchdev_port_obj_add(SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_CC_PEER_MEP_CFM) > > > switchdev_port_obj_del(SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_CC_PEER_MEP_CFM) > > > > > > Start/stop CCM transmission > > > switchdev_port_obj_add(SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_CC_CCM_TX_CFM) > > > > > > Get MEP status > > > switchdev_port_obj_get(SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MEP_STATUS_CFM) > > > > > > Get Peer MEP status > > > switchdev_port_obj_get(SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PEER_MEP_STATUS_CFM) > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vul...@microchip.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Henrik Bjoernlund <henrik.bjoernl...@microchip.com> > > > > You have to submit the driver parts as a part of this patchset. > > Otherwise it is no good. > Fair enough. > > With MRP we did it like this, and after Nik asked for details on what is > being offload, we thought that adding this would help. > > The reason why we did not include the implementation of this interface > is that it is for a new SoC which is still not fully available which is > why we have not done the basic SwitchDev driver for it yet. But the > basic functionality clearly needs to come first. > > Our preference is to continue fixing the comments we got on the pure SW > implementation and then get back to the SwitchDev offloading. > > This will mean dropping the last 2 patches in the serie. > > Does that work for you Jiri, and Nik? > > /Allan >
Sounds good to me. Sorry I was unresponsive last week, but I was sick and couldn't get to netdev@. I'll review the set today. Cheers, Nik
