On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:48 PM Joe Perches <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 12:08 +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:03 PM Dwaipayan Ray <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > The author signed-off-by checks are currently very vague. > > > Cases like same name or same address are not handled separately. > > Likely now, the type should be changed from NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF > to a single something else for all the other types of messages. > > Since BAD_SIGNOFF is being used for a different context, then probably BAD_AUTHOR_SIGNOFF.
Should this work or anything else you have in mind? Thanks, Dwaipayan.
