On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:18:39AM +0000, Hans-Christian Egtvedt (hegtvedt) wrote: > On 15/10/2020 11:57, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 09:43:32AM +0200, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt > > wrote: > >> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]> > >> > >> This makes hci_encrypt_cfm calls hci_connect_cfm in case the connection > >> state is BT_CONFIG so callers don't have to check the state. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]> > >> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> > >> (cherry picked from commit 3ca44c16b0dcc764b641ee4ac226909f5c421aa3) > > > > This is only in 5.8, what about all the other stable kernels? > > > >> (cherry picked from commit 0a60996c7fa7010ea00d9b62fb6996d908a01ead) > > > > Where is this commit from? I don't see it in Linus's tree. > > Ops, my bad, I have a Linux 4.9 branch, which also includes the Android > 4.9 kernel changes from Google. And since I noticed the patches in my > (merged from Android latest) linux-4.9.y branch, I thought the patches > were applied through all stable releases 4.9 and up.
I just looked at the google common android trees, and do not see this commit in the android-4.9-q branch. What branch are you seeing it in? > >> --- > >> AFAICT, fixing CVE 2020-10135 Bluetooth impersonation attacks have been > >> left out for the 4.4 stable kernel. I cherry picked what I assume are > >> the appropriate two patches missing from the 4.9 stable kernel. Please > >> add them to upcoming 4.4 stable releases. > > > > Why are you merging 2 commits together? Please provide backports for > > all stable kernels, if you want to see this in the 4.4.y tree. We can > > not have someone move from an older tree to a newer one and have a > > regression. > > Agreed, I have managed to trick myself into thinking the 4.4.y branch > was left out, but I assume these patches are required for all LTS branches. They are, but if you have copies of them, please feel free to share them. thanks, greg k-h
