On 10/15/20 8:34 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15 2020 at 08:31, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 10/15/20 8:11 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> We could, should probably make it:
>>
>> static void handle_signal_work(ti_work, regs)
>> {
>> if (ti_work & _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
>> tracehook_notify_signal();
>>
>> if (ti_work & _TIF_SIGPENDING)
>> arch_do_signal(regs);
>> }
>>
>> and then we can skip modifying arch_do_signal() all together, as it'll
>> only be called if _TIF_SIGPENDING is set.
>
> Then you loose the syscall restart thing which was the whole point of
> this exercise :)
Hah oh yeah, good point... But then we need to touch every arch
do_signal() anyway, so probably not much point in making the change
then.
--
Jens Axboe
