On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:14 AM Rasmus Villemoes
<li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
>
> That's certainly garbage. Now, I don't know if it's a sufficient fix (or
> could break something else), but the obvious first step of rearranging
> so that the ptr argument is evaluated before the assignment to __val_pu
Ack. We could do that.
I'm more inclined to just bite the bullet and go back to the ugly
conditional on the size that I had hoped to avoid, but if that turns
out too ugly, mind signing off on your patch and I'll have that as a
fallback?
Linus
