Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:30:59 -0400 Miaohe Lin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> swap_ra_info() may leave ra_info untouched in non_swap_entry() case as
>> page table lock is not held. In this case, we have ra_info.nr_pte == 0
>> and it is meaningless to continue with swap cache readahead. Skip such
>> ops by init ra_info.win = 1.
>>
>
>Looks right. But I think it would be better to fix this in
>swap_ra_info() - make it more consistent in its return state.
>
I think modernify the struct initializer is better because it means we have to
swap in one page at least.
Many thanks.
>Otherwise, let's modernify that struct initializer:
>
>---
>a/mm/swap_state.c~mm-swap_state-skip-meaningless-swap-cache-readahead-when-ra_infowin-==-0-fix
>+++ a/mm/swap_state.c
>@@ -839,7 +839,9 @@ static struct page *swap_vma_readahead(s
> swp_entry_t entry;
> unsigned int i;
> bool page_allocated;
>- struct vma_swap_readahead ra_info = {1,};
>+ struct vma_swap_readahead ra_info = {
>+ .win = 1,
>+ };
>
> swap_ra_info(vmf, &ra_info);
> if (ra_info.win == 1)
>_
>
