* Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > This was not any "formal" x86 maintainance activity - your patches are
> > still cooking. But i was thinking about maybe putting these patches into
> > the x86 test grind to get them shaken out some more the random 1000
> > bootup tests a day that it does. When integrating your patches I found a
> > bug and tentatively reported it to you, pointing out that it could
> > easily be my merge fault. Basically i was offering you to let your
> > patches cook in another kitchen as well. I never before had a negative
> > response to that :-/
>
> You could have asked me for a patch against the x86 tree instead of
> forcing these into your tree. [...]
ugh? What i did was something even better: i merged your patches myself
(with some caveats, which i pointed out). That's something that people
consider as a "cool, you just saved me some work!" moment, not a "hey,
dont you dare forcing MY patches into your tree" incident ;-) At least
that's how 99.9% of the people on lkml typically see it.
You really need to take a vacation ASAP! =B-)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
