On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 09:13:01AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 27/10/2020 13:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.2 release. > > There are 757 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:52:54 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.2-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > linux-5.9.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > One known/expected failure, but all other tests passing for Tegra ... > > Test results for stable-v5.9: > 15 builds: 15 pass, 0 fail > 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail > 61 tests: 60 pass, 1 fail > > Linux version: 5.9.2-rc1-ge0fc09529493 > Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, > tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, > tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, > tegra30-cardhu-a04 > > Tested-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]> > > The above failure is fixed in the mainline by the following commit ... > > commit 97148d0ae5303bcc18fcd1c9b968a9485292f32a > Author: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > Date: Tue Oct 13 10:42:47 2020 +0530 > > cpufreq: Improve code around unlisted freq check > > > Let me know if we can pull into linux-5.9.y.
Thanks, I'll go queue that up now. And thanks for testing all of these, much appreciated. greg k-h
