On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 08:52:17AM +0800, Tian Tao wrote: > The code has been in a irq-disabled context since it is hard IRQ. There > is no necessity to do it again. >
Ah, yes. This should save few cycles! > Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]> Thanks, Mani > --- > drivers/mmc/host/owl-mmc.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/owl-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/owl-mmc.c > index ccf214a..82d2bad 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/owl-mmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/owl-mmc.c > @@ -134,10 +134,9 @@ static void owl_mmc_update_reg(void __iomem *reg, > unsigned int val, bool state) > static irqreturn_t owl_irq_handler(int irq, void *devid) > { > struct owl_mmc_host *owl_host = devid; > - unsigned long flags; > u32 state; > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&owl_host->lock, flags); > + spin_lock(&owl_host->lock); > > state = readl(owl_host->base + OWL_REG_SD_STATE); > if (state & OWL_SD_STATE_TEI) { > @@ -147,7 +146,7 @@ static irqreturn_t owl_irq_handler(int irq, void *devid) > complete(&owl_host->sdc_complete); > } > > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owl_host->lock, flags); > + spin_unlock(&owl_host->lock); > > return IRQ_HANDLED; > } > -- > 2.7.4 >
