On Dec 4, 2007 11:49 AM, Alessandro Zummo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 11:47:56 -0500 > "Mike Frysinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the return of ENOTTY is to say "changing of freq isnt supported", not > > that the value is invalid. but i can get the same behavior by > > deleting the function as the rtc-dev layer will take care of returning > > ENOTTY. > > > > so the behavior is for the RTC_IRQP_SET ioctl: > > - return ENOTTY if you cannot change freq > > - the rtc-dev layer will do this for you if you do not set irq_set_freq > > - return EINVAL if the requested freq is not within the capabilities > > of the hardware > > > > sound about right ? > > yes, it is. I agree about deleting it.
so, merge this patch and i'll follow up with another to delete the func and update the documentation ? -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
