From: Zhouyi Zhou <[email protected]> This commit fixes a typo in the rcu_blocking_is_gp() function's header comment.
Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index e790b85..e825b3b 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -3572,7 +3572,7 @@ void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void) * During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically * implies a grace period. Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPTION. * - * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any + * However, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited(). It is OK to -- 2.9.5
