On 11/6/20 4:42 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Hi Viresh, > > On 11/6/20 4:03 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so >> there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 12 ++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c >> index 1e684a448c9e..143fd58ec3dc 100644 >> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c >> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c >> @@ -158,10 +158,8 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev) >> >> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev); >> clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk); >> - if (bus->opp_table) { >> - dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table); >> - bus->opp_table = NULL; >> - } >> + dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table); >> + bus->opp_table = NULL; >> } >> >> static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev) >> @@ -444,10 +442,8 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device >> *pdev) >> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev); >> clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk); >> err_reg: >> - if (!passive) { >> - dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table); >> - bus->opp_table = NULL; >> - } >> + dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table); >> + bus->opp_table = NULL; >> >> return ret; >> } >> > > Applied it. Thanks. >
It seems that this patch depends on first patch. So, need to be merged to one git repository. Instead of applying it to devfreq.git, Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <[email protected]> -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics
