Hi, On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:21:01PM +0800, Frank Lee wrote: > From: Yangtao Li <[email protected]> > > Sid should be an efuse type device accurately. And no one > needs sid label, so delete it. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi > index dc238814013c..96543df5d890 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi > @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ mmc2: mmc@1c11000 { > #size-cells = <0>; > }; > > - sid: eeprom@1c14000 { > + efuse@1c14000 { > compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sid"; > reg = <0x1c14000 0x400>; > #address-cells = <1>;
I agree with this on principle, but we should do it on all the SoCs at once. Can you send another version doing so? Thanks! Maxime
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
