Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: smsc: add missed clk_disable_unprepare in smsc_phy_probe()

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:23:59 +0800 Zhang Changzhong wrote:
> Add the missing clk_disable_unprepare() before return from
> smsc_phy_probe() in the error handling case.
> 
> Fixes: bedd8d78aba3 ("net: phy: smsc: LAN8710/20: add phy refclk in support")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hul...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzh...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/smsc.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
> index ec97669..0fc39ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
> @@ -291,8 +291,10 @@ static int smsc_phy_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
>               return ret;
>  
>       ret = clk_set_rate(priv->refclk, 50 * 1000 * 1000);
> -     if (ret)
> +     if (ret) {
> +             clk_disable_unprepare(priv->refclk);
>               return ret;
> +     }
>  
>       return 0;
>  }

Applied, thanks!

The code right above looks highly questionable as well:

        priv->refclk = clk_get_optional(dev, NULL);
        if (IS_ERR(priv->refclk))
                dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(priv->refclk), "Failed to request 
clock\n");
 
        ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->refclk);
        if (ret)
                return ret;

I don't think clk_prepare_enable() will be too happy to see an error
pointer. This should probably be:

        priv->refclk = clk_get_optional(dev, NULL);
        if (IS_ERR(priv->refclk))
                return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(priv->refclk), 
                                      "Failed to request clock\n");