On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:02:58PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.245 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:45:32 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
Build results:
        total: 165 pass: 164 fail: 1
Failed builds:
        powerpc:ppc64e_defconfig
Qemu test results:
        total: 328 pass: 323 fail: 5
Failed tests:
        ppc64:ppce500:corenet64_smp_defconfig:e5500:initrd
        ppc64:ppce500:corenet64_smp_defconfig:e5500:nvme:rootfs
        ppc64:ppce500:corenet64_smp_defconfig:e5500:sdhci:mmc:rootfs
        ppc64:ppce500:corenet64_smp_defconfig:e5500:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs
        ppc64:ppce500:corenet64_smp_defconfig:e5500:sata-sii3112:rootfs 

Failure in all cases is:

In file included from arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c:10:0:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h:11:29: error: redefinition of 
‘allow_user_access’
 static __always_inline void allow_user_access(void __user *to, const void 
__user *from,
                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:12:0,
                 from arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c:8:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kup.h:12:20: note: previous definition of 
‘allow_user_access’ was here
 static inline void allow_user_access(void __user *to, const void __user *from,
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c:10:0:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h:16:20: error: redefinition of 
‘prevent_user_access’
 static inline void prevent_user_access(void __user *to, const void __user 
*from,
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:12:0,
                 from arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c:8:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kup.h:14:20: note: previous definition of 
‘prevent_user_access’ was here
 static inline void prevent_user_access(void __user *to, const void __user 
*from,
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

Guenter

Reply via email to