On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:43:01 +0000,
David Brazdil <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Small refactor so that nVHE's handle_trap uses a switch on the Exception
> Class value of ESR_EL2 in preparation for adding a handler of SMC32/64.

nit: SMC32 seems to be a leftover from the previous version.

>
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c 
> b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> index 411b0f652417..19332c20fcde 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> @@ -16,9 +16,9 @@
>  
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_nvhe_init_params, kvm_init_params);
>  
> -static void handle_host_hcall(unsigned long func_id,
> -                           struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> +static void handle_host_hcall(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
>  {
> +     unsigned long func_id = host_ctxt->regs.regs[0];
>       unsigned long ret = 0;
>  
>       switch (func_id) {
> @@ -109,11 +109,12 @@ static void handle_host_hcall(unsigned long func_id,
>  void handle_trap(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
>  {
>       u64 esr = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ESR);
> -     unsigned long func_id;
>  
> -     if (ESR_ELx_EC(esr) != ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64)
> +     switch (ESR_ELx_EC(esr)) {
> +     case ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64:
> +             handle_host_hcall(host_ctxt);
> +             break;
> +     default:
>               hyp_panic();
> -
> -     func_id = host_ctxt->regs.regs[0];
> -     handle_host_hcall(func_id, host_ctxt);
> +     }
>  }
> -- 
> 2.29.2.299.gdc1121823c-goog
> 
> 

Thanks,

        M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Reply via email to