On 11/24/20 4:49 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > LGTM! Please address the nit and repost without the iproute2 patch. > Mixing the iproute2 patch in has confused patchwork: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=389667&state=* > > Note how it thinks that the iproute2 patch is part of the kernel > series. This build bot-y thing is pretty new. I'll add a suggestion > to our process documentation not to mix patches.
That was me - I suggested doing that. I have done that in the past as has several other people. I don't recall DaveM having a problem, so maybe it is the new patchworks that is not liking it? > >> I would like to thank David Ahern for his support during the development of >> this patchset. > > Should I take this to mean that David has review the code off-list? > reviews and general guidance.
