On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:07:44PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote: > Either way would be Ok with me, I would suggest retaining the history though > so that the details in the changelog are preserved of the issues we faced, > and in the future we can refer back to them.
Well, in part that's what we have mail archives for. My main concern is that there's a lot of back and forth in the patches as presented and that makes review really awkward. I've done some of the patch munging proposed, I might do more if I find the motivation. But first I should probably go read all that API crud you did on top, I've not read that before...