On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 07:43:46PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/27/20 9:57 AM, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/networking/filter.rst 
> > b/Documentation/networking/filter.rst
> [...]
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c 
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
> > index 0a721f6e8676..1c9efc74edfc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
> > @@ -3109,13 +3109,19 @@ mem_xadd(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct 
> > nfp_insn_meta *meta, bool is64)
> >     return 0;
> >   }
> > -static int mem_xadd4(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
> > +static int mem_atomic4(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta 
> > *meta)
> >   {
> > +   if (meta->insn.off != BPF_ADD)
> > +           return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> You probably missed this change. it should be meta->insn.imm != BPF_ADD.
> 
> > +
> >     return mem_xadd(nfp_prog, meta, false);
> >   }
> > -static int mem_xadd8(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
> > +static int mem_atomic8(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta 
> > *meta)
> >   {
> > +   if (meta->insn.off != BPF_ADD)
> 
> same as above.

Dang. Many thanks for the careful review!

Reply via email to