On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 03:55:19PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 06:46:44AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > > So after having talked to Sven a bit, the thing that is happening, is
> > > that this is the one place where we take interrupts with RCU being
> > > disabled. Normally RCU is watching and all is well, except during idle.
> > 
> > Isn't interrupt entry supposed to invoke rcu_irq_enter() at some point?
> > Or did this fall victim to recent optimizations?
> 
> It does, but the problem is that s390 is still using

I might've been too quick there, I can't actually seem to find where
s390 does rcu_irq_enter()/exit().

Also, I'm thinking the below might just about solve the current problem.
The next problem would then be it calling TRACE_IRQS_ON after it did
rcu_irq_exit()... :/


---
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/irq.h
index 9f75d67b8c20..24d3dd482df7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ void irq_subclass_unregister(enum irq_subclass subclass);
 
 #define irq_canonicalize(irq)  (irq)
 
+extern __visible void ext_do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long vector);
+
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
 #endif /* _ASM_IRQ_H */
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
index 26bb0603c5a1..b8e89b685038 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
@@ -976,16 +976,10 @@ ENTRY(ext_int_handler)
        xc      __PT_FLAGS(8,%r11),__PT_FLAGS(%r11)
        TSTMSK  __LC_CPU_FLAGS,_CIF_IGNORE_IRQ
        jo      .Lio_restore
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS)
-       tmhh    %r8,0x300
-       jz      1f
-       TRACE_IRQS_OFF
-1:
-#endif
        xc      __SF_BACKCHAIN(8,%r15),__SF_BACKCHAIN(%r15)
        lgr     %r2,%r11                # pass pointer to pt_regs
        lghi    %r3,EXT_INTERRUPT
-       brasl   %r14,do_IRQ
+       brasl   %r14,ext_do_IRQ
        j       .Lio_return
 ENDPROC(ext_int_handler)
 
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
index 3514420f0259..f4a29114e9fd 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
@@ -329,3 +329,23 @@ void irq_subclass_unregister(enum irq_subclass subclass)
        spin_unlock(&irq_subclass_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_subclass_unregister);
+
+noinstr void ext_do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long vector)
+{
+       bool rcu = false;
+
+       lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0);
+       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) && is_idle_task(current)) {
+               rcu_irq_enter();
+               rcu = true;
+       }
+       /* instrumentation_begin(); */
+
+       trace_hardirqs_off_finish();
+
+       do_IRQ(regs, vector);
+
+       /* instrumentation_end(); */
+       if (rcu)
+               rcu_irq_exit();
+}

Reply via email to