Jerry Snitselaar @ 2020-11-30 20:26 MST:
> Jerry Snitselaar @ 2020-11-30 19:58 MST:
>
>> When enabling the interrupt code for the tpm_tis driver we have
>> noticed some systems have a bios issue causing an interrupt storm to
>> occur. The issue isn't limited to a single tpm or system manufacturer
>> so keeping a denylist of systems with the issue isn't optimal. Instead
>> try to detect the problem occurring, disable interrupts, and revert to
>> polling when it happens.
>>
>> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jar...@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@ziepe.ca>
>> Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhu...@gmx.de>
>> Cc: James Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mj...@google.com>
>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnit...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> v2: drop tpm_tis specific workqueue and use just system_wq
>>
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> index 23b60583928b..72cc8a5a152c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>> #include <linux/wait.h>
>> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/freezer.h>
>> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
>> #include "tpm.h"
>> #include "tpm_tis_core.h"
>>
>> @@ -745,9 +747,23 @@ static irqreturn_t tis_int_handler(int dummy, void
>> *dev_id)
>> {
>> struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_id;
>> struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
>> + static bool check_storm = true;
>> + static unsigned int check_start;
>> u32 interrupt;
>> int i, rc;
>>
>> + if (unlikely(check_storm)) {
>> + if (!check_start) {
>> + check_start = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies);
>> + } else if ((kstat_irqs(priv->irq) > 1000) &&
>> + (jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies) - check_start < 500)) {
>> + check_storm = false;
>> + schedule_work(&priv->storm_work);
>> + } else if (jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies) - check_start >= 500) {
>> + check_storm = false;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> rc = tpm_tis_read32(priv, TPM_INT_STATUS(priv->locality), &interrupt);
>> if (rc < 0)
>> return IRQ_NONE;
>> @@ -987,6 +1003,14 @@ static const struct tpm_class_ops tpm_tis = {
>> .clk_enable = tpm_tis_clkrun_enable,
>> };
>>
>> +static void tpm_tis_storm_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> + struct tpm_tis_data *priv = container_of(work, struct tpm_tis_data,
>> storm_work);
>> +
>> + disable_interrupts(priv->chip);
>> + dev_warn(&priv->chip->dev, "Interrupt storm detected, using
>> polling.\n");
>> +}
>> +
>> int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int
>> irq,
>> const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops *phy_ops,
>> acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle)
>> @@ -1003,6 +1027,9 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct
>> tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
>> if (IS_ERR(chip))
>> return PTR_ERR(chip);
>>
>> + priv->chip = chip;
>> + INIT_WORK(&priv->storm_work, tpm_tis_storm_work);
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> chip->acpi_dev_handle = acpi_dev_handle;
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
>> b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
>> index edeb5dc61c95..5630f294dc0c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
>> @@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ struct tpm_tis_data {
>> u16 clkrun_enabled;
>> wait_queue_head_t int_queue;
>> wait_queue_head_t read_queue;
>> + struct work_struct storm_work;
>> + struct tpm_chip *chip;
>> const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops *phy_ops;
>> unsigned short rng_quality;
>> };
>
> I've tested this with the Intel platform that has an Infineon chip that
> I found the other week. It works, but isn't the complete fix. With this
> on top of James' patchset I sometimes see the message "Lost Interrupt
> waiting for TPM stat", so I guess there needs to be a check in
> wait_for_tpm_stat and request_locality to see if interrupts were
> disabled when the wait_event_interruptible_timeout call times out.
As kernel test robot pointed out. kstat_irqs isn't visible when tpm_tis
builds as a module. It looks like it is only called by kstat_irq_usrs,
and that is only by the fs/proc code. I have a patch to export it, but
the i915 driver open codes their own version instead of using it. Is
there any reason not to export it?
