Hi, On 12/7/20 6:46 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > > The ACPI namespace scanning code uses the terms master/slave when > populating the list of _DEP dependencies, but that use has no > external exposures and is not mandated by nor associated with any > external specifications. > > Change the language used through-out to supplier/consumer. > > No functional impact. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Thanks, patch looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Regards, Hans > --- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c > @@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ static u64 spcr_uart_addr; > > struct acpi_dep_data { > struct list_head node; > - acpi_handle master; > - acpi_handle slave; > + acpi_handle supplier; > + acpi_handle consumer; > }; > > void acpi_scan_lock_acquire(void) > @@ -1881,8 +1881,8 @@ static void acpi_device_dep_initialize(s > if (!dep) > return; > > - dep->master = dep_devices.handles[i]; > - dep->slave = adev->handle; > + dep->supplier = dep_devices.handles[i]; > + dep->consumer = adev->handle; > adev->dep_unmet++; > > mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock); > @@ -2058,8 +2058,8 @@ void acpi_walk_dep_device_list(acpi_hand > > mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock); > list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, tmp, &acpi_dep_list, node) { > - if (dep->master == handle) { > - acpi_bus_get_device(dep->slave, &adev); > + if (dep->supplier == handle) { > + acpi_bus_get_device(dep->consumer, &adev); > if (!adev) > continue; > > > >
