Re: [PATCH] power: supply: axp288_fuel_gauge: Add the ECS EF20EA to the blacklist

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 12/9/20 5:50 AM, Chris Chiu wrote:
> The ECS EF20EA laptop ships an AXP288 but it is actually using a
> different, separate FG chip for AC and battery monitoring. On this
> laptop we need to keep using the regular ACPI driver and disable the
> AXP288 FG to avoid reporting two batteries to userspace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Chiu <c...@endlessos.org>
> ---
>  drivers/power/supply/axp288_fuel_gauge.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/axp288_fuel_gauge.c 
> b/drivers/power/supply/axp288_fuel_gauge.c
> index 148eb8105803..a15c322c79ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/axp288_fuel_gauge.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/axp288_fuel_gauge.c
> @@ -739,6 +739,12 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id 
> axp288_fuel_gauge_blacklist[] = {
>                       DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Z83-4"),
>               }
>       },
> +     {
> +             /* ECS EF20 */
> +             .matches = {
> +                     DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "EF20"),
> +             },
> +     },
>       {}
>  };

The axp288_fuel_gauge_blacklist already has the following entry:

        {
                /* ECS EF20EA */
                .matches = {
                        DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "EF20EA"),
                },
        },

So is this real entry really necessary? The existing entry
matches the quirk for this in drivers/acpi/battery.c:

        {
                /* ECS EF20EA, AXP288 PMIC but uses separate fuel-gauge */
                .callback = battery_do_not_check_pmic_quirk,
                .matches = {
                        DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "EF20EA"),
                },
        },

And the one in drivers/acpi/ac.c:

        {
                /* ECS EF20EA, AXP288 PMIC but uses separate fuel-gauge */
                .callback = ac_do_not_check_pmic_quirk,
                .matches = {
                        DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "EF20EA"),
                },
        },

So I don't think that this patch is necessary...

Regards,

Hans