From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

In some cases acpi_pci_find_companion() returns an incorrect device
object as the ACPI companion for device 0 on the root bus (bus 0).

On the affected systems that device is the PCI interface to the
host bridge and the "ACPI companion" returned for it corresponds
to a non-PCI device located in the SoC (e.g. a sensor on an I2C
bus).  As a result of this, the ACPI device object "attached"
to PCI device 00:00.0 cannot be used for enumerating the device
that is really represented by it which (of course) is problematic.

Address that issue by preventing acpi_pci_find_companion() from
returning a device object with a valid _HID (which by the spec
should not be present uder ACPI device objects corresponding to
PCI devices) for PCI device 00:00.0.

Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/[email protected]/
Reported-by: Daniel Scally <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c |   20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
@@ -1162,14 +1162,32 @@ void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus
 static struct acpi_device *acpi_pci_find_companion(struct device *dev)
 {
        struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
+       struct acpi_device *adev;
        bool check_children;
        u64 addr;
 
        check_children = pci_is_bridge(pci_dev);
        /* Please ref to ACPI spec for the syntax of _ADR */
        addr = (PCI_SLOT(pci_dev->devfn) << 16) | PCI_FUNC(pci_dev->devfn);
-       return acpi_find_child_device(ACPI_COMPANION(dev->parent), addr,
+       adev = acpi_find_child_device(ACPI_COMPANION(dev->parent), addr,
                                      check_children);
+       /*
+        * There may be ACPI device objects in the ACPI namespace that are
+        * children of the device object representing the host bridge, but don't
+        * represent PCI devices.  Both _HID and _ADR may be present for them,
+        * even though that is against the specification (for example, see
+        * Section 6.1 of ACPI 6.3), but in many cases the _ADR returns 0 which
+        * appears to indicate that they should not be taken into consideration
+        * as potential companions of PCI devices on the root bus.
+        *
+        * To catch this special case, disregard the returned device object if
+        * it has a valid _HID, addr is 0 and the PCI device at hand is on the
+        * root bus.
+        */
+       if (adev && adev->pnp.type.platform_id && !addr && 
!pci_dev->bus->parent)
+               return NULL;
+
+       return adev;
 }
 
 /**



Reply via email to