Fix a preemption bug in kprobe_handler(). It has to call preempt_enable()
before returning.
I think this is critical on preemptive kernel.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c 2007-12-18 12:51:00.000000000 -0500
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c 2007-12-18 12:53:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -467,7 +467,8 @@
                                arch_disarm_kprobe(p);
                                regs->ip = (unsigned long)p->addr;
                                reset_current_kprobe();
-                               return 1;
+                               ret = 1;
+                               goto no_kprobe;
 #endif
                        }
                        /* We have reentered the kprobe_handler(), since
@@ -481,7 +482,7 @@
                        kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
                        prepare_singlestep(p, regs);
                        kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_REENTER;
-                       return 1;
+                       ret = 1;
                } else {
                        if (*addr != BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
                        /* The breakpoint instruction was removed by

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to