From: Vincenzo Frascino <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit c041098c690fe53cea5d20c62f128a4f7a5c19fe ]

The size of vm area can be affected by the presence or not of the guard
page.  In particular when VM_NO_GUARD is present, the actual accessible
size has to be considered like the real size minus the guard page.

Currently kasan does not keep into account this information during the
poison operation and in particular tries to poison the guard page as well.

This approach, even if incorrect, does not cause an issue because the tags
for the guard page are written in the shadow memory.  With the future
introduction of the Tag-Based KASAN, being the guard page inaccessible by
nature, the write tag operation on this page triggers a fault.

Fix kasan shadow poisoning size invoking get_vm_area_size() instead of
accessing directly the field in the data structure to detect the correct
value.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: d98c9e83b5e7c ("kasan: fix crashes on access to memory mapped by 
vm_map_ram()")
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 75913f685c71e..279dc0c96568c 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2256,7 +2256,7 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int 
deallocate_pages)
        debug_check_no_locks_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
        debug_check_no_obj_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
 
-       kasan_poison_vmalloc(area->addr, area->size);
+       kasan_poison_vmalloc(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
 
        vm_remove_mappings(area, deallocate_pages);
 
-- 
2.27.0



Reply via email to