On 2021/1/3 12:08, dinghao....@zju.edu.cn wrote:
Hi,
On 2021/1/2 17:50, Dinghao Liu wrote:
When irq_domain_get_irq_data() or irqd_cfg() fails
meanwhile i == 0, data allocated by kzalloc() has not
been freed before returning, which leads to memleak.
Fixes: b106ee63abccb ("irq_remapping/vt-d: Enhance Intel IR driver to support
hierarchical irqdomains")
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao....@zju.edu.cn>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
index aeffda92b10b..cdaeed36750f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
@@ -1354,6 +1354,8 @@ static int intel_irq_remapping_alloc(struct irq_domain
*domain,
irq_cfg = irqd_cfg(irq_data);
if (!irq_data || !irq_cfg) {
ret = -EINVAL;
+ kfree(data);
+ data = NULL;
Do you need to check (i == 0) here? @data will not be used anymore as it
goes to out branch, why setting it to NULL here?
data will be passed to ire_data->chip_data when i == 0 and
intel_free_irq_resources() will free it on failure. Thus I
Isn't it going to "goto out_free_data"? If "i == 0", the allocated @data
won't be freed by intel_free_irq_resources(), hence memory leaking. Does
this patch aim to fix this?
Best regards,
baolu
set it to NULL to prevent double-free. However, if we add
a check (i == 0) here, we will not need to set it to NULL.
If this is better, I will resend a new patch soon.
Regards,
Dinghao
