* Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ingo.
> 
> commit fbdcf18df73758b2e187ab94678b30cd5f6ff9f9 is not needed. another 
> patch (by you !! commit 699d934d5f958d7944d195c03c334f28cc0b3669 x86: 
> fixup cpu_info array conversion) already removed clearing of 
> c->cpu_index. in identify_cpu
> also it is not consisent to smpboot_32.c. (it will assign id to 
> cpu_index right after
>
>       *c = boot_cpu_data;
> )

well, it might in the worst-case be a superfluous change, but not cause 
any problems in 2.6.24, right?

> by revert commit fbdcf18df73758b2e187ab94678b30cd5f6ff9f9, we could 
> use c->cpu_index in identify_cpu.

but that's 2.6.25 stuff, right? Travis?

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to