On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 06:30, Nitesh Narayan Lal <nit...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> This reverts commit d7a08882a0a4b4e176691331ee3f492996579534.
>
> After the introduction of the patch:
>
> 87fa7f3e9: x86/kvm: Move context tracking where it belongs
>
> since we have moved guest_exit_irqoff closer to the VM-Exit, explicit
> enabling of irqs to process pending interrupts should not be required
> within vcpu_enter_guest anymore.
>
> Conflicts:
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nit...@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 9 +++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 -----------
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index cce0143a6f80..c9b2fbb32484 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -4187,6 +4187,15 @@ static int svm_check_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> static void svm_handle_exit_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> + kvm_before_interrupt(vcpu);
> + local_irq_enable();
> + /*
> + * We must have an instruction with interrupts enabled, so
> + * the timer interrupt isn't delayed by the interrupt shadow.
> + */
> + asm("nop");
> + local_irq_disable();
> + kvm_after_interrupt(vcpu);
> }
Why do we need to reintroduce this part?
Wanpeng
