On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:54:15 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> struct page_cgroup *page_get_page_cgroup(struct page *page)
> >> {
> >> return (struct page_cgroup *)
> >> (page->page_cgroup & ~PAGE_CGROUP_LOCK);
> >> }
> >>
> >> I guess the issue is that often a "get" function has a complementary
> >> "put" function, but this isn't one of them. Would page_page_cgroup
> >> be a better name, perhaps? I don't know.
> >
> > Ah, yes, I mistakenly assumed it was a reference get. In that case I
> > stand corrected and do not have any objections.
> >
>
> I was going to say the same thing, page_get_page_cgroup() does not hold
> any references. May be _get_ in the name is confusing.
It is a bit unconventional. page_cgroup()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
