Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:14:05PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> > Remains the question whether it is intended that many, perhaps even
> > large, tables are compiled in without ever having a chance to get used,
> > i.e. whether there shouldn't #ifdef CONFIG_xxx get added.
>
> > -static struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_param_table[] = {
> > +static const struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {
>
> we lost the _param, which will cause a duplicate definition with ..
>
> > -static struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {
> > +static const struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {
>
> cut-n-paste thinko ?
Thanks, for catching that.
Anyway this patch looks sound in principle but I expect it might conflict
with the bug fix Andrew just merged.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
