Hi Arnd, On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:59 AM Arnd Bergmann <a...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:19 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 11:55 PM Arnd Bergmann <a...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > * MIPS R3000/TX39xx: 32-bit MIPS-II generation, mostly superseded by > > > 64-bit MIPS-III (R4000 and higher) starting in 1991. arch/mips still > > > supports these in DECstation and Toshiba Txx9, but it appears that most > > > of those machines are of the 64-bit kind. Later MIPS32 such as 4Kc and > > > later are rather different and widely used. > > > > I have a (32-bit) RBTX4927 development board in my board farm, boot-test > > every bi-weekly renesas-drivers release on it, and fix kernel issues > > when they appear. > > Right, I was specifically thinking of the MIPS-II/R3000 ones here, I know > there are users on multiple actively maintained MIPS-III platforms. > > Regarding 32-bit vs 64-bit kernels, can you clarify what makes this one > a 32-bit board? Is this just your preference for which kernel you install, > or are there dependencies on firmware or hardware that require running > this machine in 32-bit mode?
TX492x is 32-bit (/proc/cpuinfo says mips1/mips2/mips3), TX493x is 64-bit. As Debian dropped support for mips3 and older, I'm stuck at a Jessie nfsroot. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds