On 2021-01-17 15:09, Johan Jonker wrote:
A test with the command below gives for example this error:
/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb.dt.yaml:
thermal-zones: 'cpu', 'gpu' do not match any of the regexes:
'^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9\\-]{1,12}-thermal$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Rename Rockchip rk3399 thermal subnodes so that it ends
with "-thermal"

make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
thermal/thermal-zones.yaml

Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <[email protected]>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts | 2 +-
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi        | 4 ++--
  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts 
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts
index c88295782..b20774081 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
  };
&thermal_zones {
-       cpu_thermal: cpu {
+       cpu_thermal: cpu-thermal {
                polling-delay-passive = <100>;
                polling-delay = <1000>;
                thermal-sensors = <&tsadc 0>;

Passing observation: why is this DT not just referencing &cpu_thermal directly to add the board-specific parts (and not repeat all the SoC default properties) anyway? Cleaning the whole thing up might have been a good idea :/

Robin.

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi 
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
index 4e94b7ebd..3de493ad6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@
        };
thermal_zones: thermal-zones {
-               cpu_thermal: cpu {
+               cpu_thermal: cpu-thermal {
                        polling-delay-passive = <100>;
                        polling-delay = <1000>;
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@
                        };
                };
- gpu_thermal: gpu {
+               gpu_thermal: gpu-thermal {
                        polling-delay-passive = <100>;
                        polling-delay = <1000>;

Reply via email to