From: Gui Jianfeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:58:21 +0800

> >> I think the following code in fib6_del_route in the latest kernel is 
> >> useless.
> >> 1125         if (fn->leaf == NULL && fn->fn_flags&RTN_TL_ROOT)
> >> 1126                 fn->leaf = &ip6_null_entry;
> >>
> >> ip6_null_entry will never be unlinked from fn->leaf now, that is,
> >> fn->leaf == NULL will never meet.
> > 
> > I think you are right, but if it is true the next block of
> > code is dead too:
> > 
> >     /* If it was last route, expunge its radix tree node */
> >     if (fn->leaf == NULL) {
> >             fn->fn_flags &= ~RTN_RTINFO;
> >             rt6_stats.fib_route_nodes--;
> >             fn = fib6_repair_tree(fn);
> >     }
> > 
> 
> I think this block of code can't be removed, because just the
> root(default route) fn->leaf always has ip6_null_entry on it. The
> normal fn->leaf becomes NULL when last route has been deleted, the
> radix tree should be expunged.

But you said (still quoted above) that fn->leaf == NULL will not
occur.

Do you mean this, only in the case that the RTN_TL_ROOT flag is set?

I thought you meant always when the function is called, fn->leaf
cannot ever be NULL.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to