On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:33:10PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> Obviously, the error variable detection of the if statement is
> for the mprotect callback function, so it is also put into the
> scope of calling callbck.
> 
> Reported-by: Jia Zhang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <[email protected]>

No fixes tag, no description what this commit does. Nothing
makes sense to me.

/Jarkko

> ---
>  mm/mprotect.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> index ab709023e9aa..94188df1ee55 100644
> --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> @@ -617,10 +617,11 @@ static int do_mprotect_pkey(unsigned long start, size_t 
> len,
>               if (tmp > end)
>                       tmp = end;
>  
> -             if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->mprotect)
> +             if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->mprotect) {
>                       error = vma->vm_ops->mprotect(vma, nstart, tmp, 
> newflags);
> -             if (error)
> -                     goto out;
> +                     if (error)
> +                             goto out;
> +             }
>  
>               error = mprotect_fixup(vma, &prev, nstart, tmp, newflags);
>               if (error)
> -- 
> 2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7
> 
> 

Reply via email to