On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 01:55 -0500, Wei Huang wrote:
> Move the instruction decode part out of x86_emulate_instruction() for it
> to be used in other places. Also kvm_clear_exception_queue() is moved
> inside the if-statement as it doesn't apply when KVM are coming back from
> userspace.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Bandan Das <b...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <b...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei.hua...@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 9a8969a6dd06..580883cee493 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -7298,6 +7298,43 @@ static bool is_vmware_backdoor_opcode(struct 
> x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>       return false;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Decode and emulate instruction. Return EMULATION_OK if success.
> + */
> +int x86_emulate_decoded_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int 
> emulation_type,
> +                                 void *insn, int insn_len)

Isn't the name of this function wrong? This function decodes the instruction.
So I would expect something like x86_decode_instruction.

> +{
> +     int r = EMULATION_OK;
> +     struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt = vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt;
> +
> +     init_emulate_ctxt(vcpu);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * We will reenter on the same instruction since
> +      * we do not set complete_userspace_io.  This does not
> +      * handle watchpoints yet, those would be handled in
> +      * the emulate_ops.
> +      */
> +     if (!(emulation_type & EMULTYPE_SKIP) &&
> +         kvm_vcpu_check_breakpoint(vcpu, &r))
> +             return r;
> +
> +     ctxt->interruptibility = 0;
> +     ctxt->have_exception = false;
> +     ctxt->exception.vector = -1;
> +     ctxt->perm_ok = false;
> +
> +     ctxt->ud = emulation_type & EMULTYPE_TRAP_UD;
> +
> +     r = x86_decode_insn(ctxt, insn, insn_len);
> +
> +     trace_kvm_emulate_insn_start(vcpu);
> +     ++vcpu->stat.insn_emulation;
> +
> +     return r;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_emulate_decoded_instruction);
> +
>  int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
>                           int emulation_type, void *insn, int insn_len)
>  {
> @@ -7317,32 +7354,12 @@ int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
> gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
>        */
>       write_fault_to_spt = vcpu->arch.write_fault_to_shadow_pgtable;
>       vcpu->arch.write_fault_to_shadow_pgtable = false;
> -     kvm_clear_exception_queue(vcpu);

I think that this change is OK, but I can't be 100% sure about this.

Best regards,
        Maxim Levitsky


>  
>       if (!(emulation_type & EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE)) {
> -             init_emulate_ctxt(vcpu);
> -
> -             /*
> -              * We will reenter on the same instruction since
> -              * we do not set complete_userspace_io.  This does not
> -              * handle watchpoints yet, those would be handled in
> -              * the emulate_ops.
> -              */
> -             if (!(emulation_type & EMULTYPE_SKIP) &&
> -                 kvm_vcpu_check_breakpoint(vcpu, &r))
> -                     return r;
> -
> -             ctxt->interruptibility = 0;
> -             ctxt->have_exception = false;
> -             ctxt->exception.vector = -1;
> -             ctxt->perm_ok = false;
> -
> -             ctxt->ud = emulation_type & EMULTYPE_TRAP_UD;
> -
> -             r = x86_decode_insn(ctxt, insn, insn_len);
> +             kvm_clear_exception_queue(vcpu);
>  
> -             trace_kvm_emulate_insn_start(vcpu);
> -             ++vcpu->stat.insn_emulation;
> +             r = x86_emulate_decoded_instruction(vcpu, emulation_type,
> +                                                 insn, insn_len);
>               if (r != EMULATION_OK)  {
>                       if ((emulation_type & EMULTYPE_TRAP_UD) ||
>                           (emulation_type & EMULTYPE_TRAP_UD_FORCED)) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> index c5ee0f5ce0f1..fc42454a4c27 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> @@ -273,6 +273,8 @@ bool kvm_mtrr_check_gfn_range_consistency(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
>                                         int page_num);
>  bool kvm_vector_hashing_enabled(void);
>  void kvm_fixup_and_inject_pf_error(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, u16 
> error_code);
> +int x86_emulate_decoded_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int 
> emulation_type,
> +                                 void *insn, int insn_len);
>  int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
>                           int emulation_type, void *insn, int insn_len);
>  fastpath_t handle_fastpath_set_msr_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);





Reply via email to