The test uses a different firmware name, and we forgot to adapt for the XZ compressed file tests.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> --- tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_filesystem.sh | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_filesystem.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_filesystem.sh index 2424a97da65b..f1976e650672 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_filesystem.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_filesystem.sh @@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ test "$HAS_FW_LOADER_COMPRESS" != "yes" && exit 0 # test with both files present xz -9 -C crc32 -k $FW +xz -9 -C crc32 -k $FW_INTO_BUF config_set_name $NAME echo echo "Testing with both plain and xz files present..." @@ -499,6 +500,7 @@ do_tests both # test with only xz file present mv "$FW" "${FW}-orig" +mv "$FW_INTO_BUF" "${FW_INTO_BUF}-orig" echo echo "Testing with only xz file present..." do_tests xzonly -- 2.26.2
