Hi Andrew Lunn,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 6:56 PM
> To: Hariprasad Kelam <hke...@marvell.com>
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> da...@davemloft.net; k...@kernel.org; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham
> <sgout...@marvell.com>; Linu Cherian <lcher...@marvell.com>;
> Geethasowjanya Akula <gak...@marvell.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
> <jer...@marvell.com>; Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbha...@marvell.com>;
> Christina Jacob <cja...@marvell.com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [Patch v2 net-next 4/7] octeontx2-af: Physical link
> configuration support
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 01:15:49PM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> > From: Christina Jacob <cja...@marvell.com>
> >
> > CGX LMAC, the physical interface support link configuration parameters
> > like speed, auto negotiation, duplex etc. Firmware saves these into
> > memory region shared between firmware and this driver.
> >
> > This patch adds mailbox handler set_link_mode, fw_data_get to
> > configure and read these parameters.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christina Jacob <cja...@marvell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgout...@marvell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hke...@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c | 60
> +++++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.h | 2 +
> > .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx_fw_if.h | 18 ++++++-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h | 21 ++++++++
> > .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cgx.c | 17 ++++++
> > 5 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c
> > index b3ae84c..42ee67e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c
> > @@ -658,6 +658,39 @@ static inline void cgx_link_usertable_init(void)
> > cgx_lmactype_string[LMAC_MODE_USXGMII] = "USXGMII"; }
> >
> > +static inline int cgx_link_usertable_index_map(int speed) {
>
> Hi Christina, Hariprasad
>
> No inline functions in .c files please. Let the compiler decide.
>
will fix this in next version
>
> > + switch (speed) {
> > + case SPEED_10:
> > + return CGX_LINK_10M;
> > + case SPEED_100:
> > + return CGX_LINK_100M;
> > + case SPEED_1000:
> > + return CGX_LINK_1G;
> > + case SPEED_2500:
> > + return CGX_LINK_2HG;
> > + case SPEED_5000:
> > + return CGX_LINK_5G;
> > + case SPEED_10000:
> > + return CGX_LINK_10G;
> > + case SPEED_20000:
> > + return CGX_LINK_20G;
> > + case SPEED_25000:
> > + return CGX_LINK_25G;
> > + case SPEED_40000:
> > + return CGX_LINK_40G;
> > + case SPEED_50000:
> > + return CGX_LINK_50G;
> > + case 80000:
> > + return CGX_LINK_80G;
> > + case SPEED_100000:
> > + return CGX_LINK_100G;
> > + case SPEED_UNKNOWN:
> > + return CGX_LINK_NONE;
> > + }
> > + return CGX_LINK_NONE;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline void link_status_user_format(u64 lstat,
> > struct cgx_link_user_info *linfo,
> > struct cgx *cgx, u8 lmac_id)
>
> So it looks like previous reviews did not catch inline functions. So lets
> say, no
> new inline functions.
>
> Andrew
Thanks for the review. I will fix this in next version.
Thanks,
Hariprasad k
