From: wengjianfeng <wengjianf...@yulong.com>

at first, ret was assigned to zero, but later assigned to
a funciton,so the assignment to zero is no use, which can
simple be removed instead.

Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianf...@yulong.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c
index 9f1f93d..cfe2dfd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c
@@ -1507,8 +1507,6 @@ static int rtl8192eu_power_on(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv)
        u32 val32;
        int ret;
 
-       ret = 0;
-
        val32 = rtl8xxxu_read32(priv, REG_SYS_CFG);
        if (val32 & SYS_CFG_SPS_LDO_SEL) {
                rtl8xxxu_write8(priv, REG_LDO_SW_CTRL, 0xc3);
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to