On Tue 2021-01-26 22:21:48, John Ogness wrote:
> In preparation for removing printk's @logbuf_lock, dumpers that have
> assumed to be protected against parallel calls must provide their own
> synchronization. Add a locally static spinlock to synchronize the
> kmsg_dump call and temporary buffer usage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/um/kernel/kmsg_dump.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/kmsg_dump.c b/arch/um/kernel/kmsg_dump.c
> index f38349ad00ea..173999422ed8 100644
> --- a/arch/um/kernel/kmsg_dump.c
> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/kmsg_dump.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  #include <linux/kmsg_dump.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/console.h>
>  #include <shared/init.h>
>  #include <shared/kern.h>
> @@ -9,8 +10,10 @@ static void kmsg_dumper_stdout(struct kmsg_dumper *dumper,
>                               enum kmsg_dump_reason reason,
>                               struct kmsg_dumper_iter *iter)
>  {
> +     static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
>       static char line[1024];
>       struct console *con;
> +     unsigned long flags;
>       size_t len = 0;
>  
>       /* only dump kmsg when no console is available */
> @@ -25,11 +28,16 @@ static void kmsg_dumper_stdout(struct kmsg_dumper *dumper,
>       if (con)
>               return;
>  
> +     if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&lock, flags))
> +             return;
> +
>       printf("kmsg_dump:\n");
>       while (kmsg_dump_get_line(iter, true, line, sizeof(line), &len)) {
>               line[len] = '\0';
>               printf("%s", line);
>       }
> +
> +     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock, flags);

What exactly is synchronized here, please?
Access to @line buffer or @iter or both?

It looks to me that the access to @line buffer was not synchronized
before. kmsg_dump_get_line() used a lock internally but
it was not synchronized with the later printf("%s", line);

The only remaining reason might be the access to @iter. But it is on stack
in kmsg_dump(). Nobody else could have access to it.

IMHO, this patch is not needed.

Do I miss something, please?

Best Regards,
Petr

Reply via email to