* Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently the notify_page_fault helper is used to test it the page
> fault was caused by a kprobe causing an early return from
> do_page_fault.
>
> Change the name of the helper to is_kprobe_fault to match the usage
> and remove the preempt_disable/enable pair around kprobe_running()
> with an explicit test for preemption. The idea for this comes from a
> patch by Quentin Barnes to kprobes.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hm, this doesnt apply:
Hunk #3 FAILED at 426.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 413 (offset -22 lines).
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
patching file arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
Hunk #3 FAILED at 476.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 475 (offset -10 lines).
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
could you double-check x86.git#mm, perhaps we are out of sync with a
patch somewhere?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
