On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:48:35 +0200 Ville Syrjälä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 11:24:54PM +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:34:01 +0200 > > Ville Syrjala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > +static struct platform_device foo_w1_device = { > > > + .name = "w1-gpio", > > > + .id = -1, > > > > Assigning -1 to a u32 member isn't a very nice example. What does it > > mean anyway? > > id is 'int'. The bus_name won't include the id when -1 is used. Ah, indeed. I was looking at 2.6.23, where it is u32. > > ...call platform_driver_probe(&w1_gpio_driver, w1_gpio_probe) here. > > I was wondering what platform_driver_probe() was for but never bothered > to read the code. I'll change the code to use it. > > I already sent an updated patch but forgot to send this reply. I saw it. Thanks :) Haavard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/