[David Woodhouse - Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:37:24PM +0000]
|
| On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
| > * David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| > > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
| > > > not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you
| > > > tried to grep this way:
| > > >
| > > > grep -E "audit_rate_limit=[0-9]+ audit_backlog" */*.c
| > >
| > > Not precisely that, but I've certainly had greps fail because people
| > > have split up strings to meet the stupid 80-character "limit".
| >
| > yes - but if you read my whole reply you'll see that i qualified it:
| >
| > >> That's pretty much the only grep pattern that would break. People
| > >> usually grep on the constant portion of the string, so breaking up a
| > >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| > >> line along a variable boundary is perfectly okay.
|
| Yes, you did. But you failed to provide any good reason for actually
| changing it, either. Leave it as it was.
|
| --
| dwmw2
|
so what i would do now? i could post updated patch *without* that
splitted line, should I?
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
