Hello! > semantics of snd_sml), maybe it makes the difference but then I don't see how. It makes. One small packet is allowed to fly, not depending on packets_out. This is idea of Minshall. "Classic" Nagle also does not prohibit this, but it is difficult to formulate it in terms of presegmented queue, used in linux, so that we preferred Minshall's approach. Third algo, used by linux-2.2: "queue as soon as packet is small and packets_out!=0" is _not_ Nagle's one, it is surely wrong. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Guus Sliepen
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar