On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:15:21PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote: > Refactor __populate_fault_info() to introduce __get_fault_info() which > will be used once the host is wrapped in a stage 2. > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 36 +++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h > b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h > index 84473574c2e7..e9005255d639 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h > @@ -157,19 +157,9 @@ static inline bool __translate_far_to_hpfar(u64 far, u64 > *hpfar) > return true; > } > > -static inline bool __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +static inline bool __get_fault_info(u64 esr, u64 *far, u64 *hpfar)
Could this take a pointer to a struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info instead? Will
