On 03/02/21 15:16, Qais Yousef wrote: > On 01/28/21 18:31, Valentin Schneider wrote: >> Giving group_misfit_task a higher group_classify() priority than >> group_imbalance doesn't seem like the right thing to do. Instead, make >> need_active_balance() return true for any migration_type when the > > s/need_active_balance()/voluntary_active_balance()/? > >> destination CPU is idle and the source CPU has a misfit task. >> >> While at it, add an sd_has_asym_cpucapacity() guard in >> need_active_balance(). > > ditto. >
Myes, clearly this has been left to ferment for too long!
